<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Twitter worth to you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.degutis.com/blog/what-is-twitter-worth-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.degutis.com/blog/what-is-twitter-worth-to-you/</link>
	<description>rambling, rambling, rambling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.degutis.com/blog/what-is-twitter-worth-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.degutis.com/blog/?p=19#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Svetlana,

Sure they are &quot;well funded&quot; but when a copy has deeper funds they can accomplish more such as more servers, better clustering, better bandwidth, more (or better) developers (e.g. Google). We hear about all the money they received recently, but how much are they currently investing in fixing the problem and how much are they banking so they don&#039;t have a cash flow problem over time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Svetlana,</p>
<p>Sure they are &#8220;well funded&#8221; but when a copy has deeper funds they can accomplish more such as more servers, better clustering, better bandwidth, more (or better) developers (e.g. Google). We hear about all the money they received recently, but how much are they currently investing in fixing the problem and how much are they banking so they don&#8217;t have a cash flow problem over time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Gladkova</title>
		<link>http://www.degutis.com/blog/what-is-twitter-worth-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.degutis.com/blog/?p=19#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I have added my vote to the $5/month variant simply because I strongly believe in paying for services that I use for business - for example, this is why we have chosen to pay for Akismet on our blog even though no one insisted we should. But the problem with Twitter is that I don&#039;t think that with more money they will be able to make it reliable - after all, it is a relatively well funded startup and the problems don&#039;t seem to be due to lack of funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have added my vote to the $5/month variant simply because I strongly believe in paying for services that I use for business &#8211; for example, this is why we have chosen to pay for Akismet on our blog even though no one insisted we should. But the problem with Twitter is that I don&#8217;t think that with more money they will be able to make it reliable &#8211; after all, it is a relatively well funded startup and the problems don&#8217;t seem to be due to lack of funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.degutis.com/blog/what-is-twitter-worth-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.degutis.com/blog/?p=19#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Svetlana,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure they are &quot;well funded&quot; but when a copy has deeper funds they can accomplish more such as more servers, better clustering, better bandwidth, more (or better) developers (e.g. Google). We hear about all the money they received recently, but how much are they currently investing in fixing the problem and how much are they banking so they don&#039;t have a cash flow problem over time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Svetlana,</p>
<p>Sure they are &#8220;well funded&#8221; but when a copy has deeper funds they can accomplish more such as more servers, better clustering, better bandwidth, more (or better) developers (e.g. Google). We hear about all the money they received recently, but how much are they currently investing in fixing the problem and how much are they banking so they don&#39;t have a cash flow problem over time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Gladkova</title>
		<link>http://www.degutis.com/blog/what-is-twitter-worth-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.degutis.com/blog/?p=19#comment-123</guid>
		<description>I have added my vote to the $5/month variant simply because I strongly believe in paying for services that I use for business - for example, this is why we have chosen to pay for Akismet on our blog even though no one insisted we should. But the problem with Twitter is that I don&#039;t think that with more money they will be able to make it reliable - after all, it is a relatively well funded startup and the problems don&#039;t seem to be due to lack of funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have added my vote to the $5/month variant simply because I strongly believe in paying for services that I use for business &#8211; for example, this is why we have chosen to pay for Akismet on our blog even though no one insisted we should. But the problem with Twitter is that I don&#39;t think that with more money they will be able to make it reliable &#8211; after all, it is a relatively well funded startup and the problems don&#39;t seem to be due to lack of funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://www.degutis.com/blog/what-is-twitter-worth-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.degutis.com/blog/?p=19#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to pay for Twitter. In all honesty, I would move over to Friendfeed if Twitter went to a paid model.

Though, I&#039;m sure they will not, as the Twitter team seems dedicated to keeping the service free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to pay for Twitter. In all honesty, I would move over to Friendfeed if Twitter went to a paid model.</p>
<p>Though, I&#8217;m sure they will not, as the Twitter team seems dedicated to keeping the service free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://www.degutis.com/blog/what-is-twitter-worth-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.degutis.com/blog/?p=19#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to pay for Twitter. In all honesty, I would move over to Friendfeed if Twitter went to a paid model.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though, I&#039;m sure they will not, as the Twitter team seems dedicated to keeping the service free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not going to pay for Twitter. In all honesty, I would move over to Friendfeed if Twitter went to a paid model.</p>
<p>Though, I&#39;m sure they will not, as the Twitter team seems dedicated to keeping the service free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
